Why neglect the security of ATMs?

Why neglect the security of ATMs?

People who go with money usually have no security. They have to go with the money and the security they deserve when they go with the money. They say this safety thing by saying in the tamil culture that if there is no weight in the lap there will be no fear along the way.

The above concept also applies to machines with cash. ATMs that have money are just as vulnerable as people who have money in recent times. Machines are also vulnerable to robbery.

The situation is such that the bank management is telling people to avoid withdrawing money at ATMs where there is not much traffic. That's right, why do banks set up ATMs in less crowded places? Why are they reluctant to put a guard there for security even though they know it is a place where there is not much movement of people?

The condition of ATM is such that robbers come with oxygen Cylinder, Cutting Machine and crowbar. There has been an incident where a person was killed near Thiruvarur in an attempt to prevent such a robbery. Should the bank management have appointed a security guard for the ATM after that? That's not it. Seven months after the incident, a guard not been appointed.

Several person get the job when a guard is assigned to each ATM. Security is also available at ATMs. There is a sense of security not only for the ATM but also for the people who come to the ATM to withdraw money.

The Reserve Bank, which lays down the rules of banking, must also consider and enforce that ATMs should not be set up without guards. This is because not only money but also human lives are being snatched from ATMs. Not only that, but such drawbacks in the security of ATMs do not create robbers.

*****